Sunday, 13 December 2015

A511.8.3.RB_Manglona,Matthew-Napu_Gender

A511.8.3.RB_Manglona,Matthew-Napu_Gender



“In today's business environment there still remains the belief that women are not as capable as men when it comes to handle the duties and pressures of top management positions” (Williams, H. E. 2014) When you think about women in the workplace or let alone think about women in leadership roles and compare them to men, women are at that same pinnacle of “whatever men can do, women can do as well”.

Dr. Kanter’s position on women not being able to what men do in high decision making roles because of the nature of the job, and the issue of dedication on time and work. (Harvard Business Review 2010). In relation to Yukl I believe what he discusses on gender-discrimination does not coincide with each other. Kanter brings up points where women now are sitting in legislative roles, and the shift to where women have broken barriers in today’s world and are able to hold these types of positions.  As Yukl discusses that there are still low numbers of women holding key leadership roles in the workplace. “men and women who are holding managerial positions in equal numbers in some industries; nevertheless, women still face gender discrimination even though they have been proven to be just as qualified, if not more qualified than their male counterparts” (Williams, H. E. 2014)

Today, women are now allowed to join combat arms in the military. With no prejudice to allowing them to join. Two women just past the covenant Ranger school for the Army, we even have women in today’s age running for President and a few years back running for Vice President. Which shows (in relation to Dr. Kanter’s position) that women are able to function in those leadership roles, despite having the stereotype of being empathetic, possessing intuition, and being more sensitive (Yukl, 2013).  So Dr. Kanter has a point when she discussed about women achieving such heights especially in the leadership realm, however still surrounded by scrutiny and not being able to recognized, almost as if the male gender is in denial and turns their heads away not wanting to recognize it.

“Worldwide, countries recognize the economic importance of women in senior positions. In China, women hold 51 percent of senior leadership positions, 31 percent in Russia, and 30 percent in Turkey. North America rests at 21 percent.3 The United States is not well positioned to take advantage of top talent” (Row, S., P.E. 2013) which goes back to what I discussed earlier that women in relation to what Dr. Katner’s discussion was about is that they are slowly catching up to men holding these positions, however maybe not recognized or there is a failure to recognize it in America, but in today’s world  times have shifted from the old way of women who were known to be “stay-at-home wives” have now shifted to world and organizational leaders.



 

                                                                      References:
Row, S., P.E. (2013). Women (and men) in leadership roles: Building a new yellow-brick road. Institute of Transportation Engineers.ITE Journal, 83(8), 32-34. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/docview/1426796467?accountid=27

Williams, H. E. (2014). Men and women in leadership positions in the public sector: Who are the best-qualified candidates? Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 11(3), 36-48. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/docview/1647069621?accountid=27203

Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in organizations-8th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Sunday, 6 December 2015

A511.7.3.RB _Manglona, Matthew-Napu_ Self-Awareness



A511.7.3.RB _Manglona, Matthew-Napu_ Self-Awareness



As I self-reflect on myself in the aspect of my leadership style, I tend to deviate from the crowd and do my own thing. I care more about my subordinates (soldiers) more than myself. I ensure that their well-being is taken care of, I sacrifice my family time to help them, and I tend to not take care of myself at times when I really need to do so. “As they interact with others, leaders seem better able to learn how they are seen and how they can actively shape others’ perceptions in the formation of their identity” (Goffee, R., & Jones, G. 2006) with that being said, my perception from my soldiers, peers, superiors, to include myself is someone who is genuine, hardworking, and cares more about my organization than myself. I was told at times that can be a danger to me, because I will fall off track of taking care of myself.

"Being aware of oneself, including one's traits, feelings, and behaviors, Self-awareness is not only about the individual leader, but the impact the leader has on others” (Beagle, M. H., J.R. 2012) I believe this to be true because when you see both negative and positive aspects of yourself you will be able to adjust your presence, leadership approach, and traits to have that certain relationship with your subordinates to better the entire organization. It allows you to become humble, keeps you grounded, and not lose sight of what is important.

I am the type of person that grew up and raised around family, respect, honor, legacies, and the list can go on about the values I hold to my heart. Having self-awareness into the leaders work and output, and creating a trusting relationship with followers (Yukl, 2013). Whenever I tend to drift off course and think a little bit bigger than myself, I always have those traits to pull me back to reality and remember why I do what I do. I think that is what separates me from the rest of my peers and superiors. Which in addition is why I have a great relationship (From what I am told from others) with my subordinates.  “Competent people in positions of leadership create a self -reality of their own that is quite different from the reality shared by others” (Beagle, M. H., J.R. 2012).

What helps me conduct self-awareness within my leadership is conducting surveys. Vineet described that he conducts a 360 degree assessment for employees to conduct and allows the employees to see it one puts accountability in the higher management and allows for trust ( as he stated “pushing the envelope”) from the employees which allows for better performance results within the organization (Harvard Business. 2010). In the Army we have a system that allows us to send a survey out to 5 of our subordinates, peers, and superiors that describe the type of leader we are, whether we are too harsh, too nice, we are negligent, and so on and so forth. The survey actually takes 5 minutes to complete and helps the leader either change for the better or for them to ignore (which in some cases actually happens), that is why  am fortunate to be in the career I am in.

Having self-awareness into the leaders work and output, and creating a trusting relationship with followers (Yukl, 2013) is a term that I like when I read it. I always look at my work ethic and the results I receive through awards, leadership advancement, and other personal accolades. Through that my success comes from my subordinates, without them I would not be in the position I am in today.






References:
Beagle, M. H., J.R. (2012). SELF-AWARENESS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL LEADERSHIP. Infantry, 101(3), 19-20. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/docview/1267125048?accountid=27203

Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2006). Getting personal on the topic of leadershipPreview the documentView in a new window. Human Resource Management International Digest , 14 (4), 32-34.

Harvard Business Review. (2010). Put Your Employees First. [Video File]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJrBq-c5QYE&feature=youtu.be&t=21s (Links to an external site.)

Yukl, G. (2013). Ethical, Servant, Spiritual, and Authentic Leadership. In Leadership in organizations. (8th ed). (pp. 341, 349). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall

Sunday, 29 November 2015

A511.6.3.RB _Manglona, Matthew-Napu_ Meaning



A511.6.3.RB _Manglona, Matthew-Napu_ Meaning

When I reflect on why leaders need to create a “cause” or “meaning” in the aspect to leading change I immediately think to “purpose”. Me as a leader when I try to influence change (for the good) in my subordinates lives whether at home or at the work place I always look for that purpose. “Cause” to me, is something that gives individuals influence, motivation, and a sense of vision to a goal or what I call an external factor. “Meaning” on the other hand, is the more spiritual, the individual person aspect, or the Internal factor to change. As I read the quotes and HRB blog to combine them and relate them to each other I would have to say that leadership needs “meaning” in its direction to accomplish goals and objectives.

The HBR Blog was quite interesting. Giving subordinates meaning in their work or simply to inspire them is the main concept of this article from what I got. “Programs that encouraged employees to take initiative and contribute to change have a five times higher success rate than those with a purely top-down thrust” (Nieuwoudt, M., & Rudman, R.2015) Subordinates necessarily just need direction and the why when leading change. Pat Zingarmi stated that “People don’t resist change, they resist being controlled” with just simply knowing the why change is occurring can get subordinates involved and feeling apart of the team (The Ken Blanchard Companies 2009).

When I transfer from one unit to the other and in front of new soldiers I generally try to establish ground with them individually. I know their previous platoon leader had his leadership style and philosophies however I have to ensure that they understand mine and are willing to accept the change I bring to the team. I notify them of my commander’s intentions and philosophies so that they too understand during training why we do what we do. Information, Personal, Implementation, Collaboration, Impact, and Refinement concerns (The Ken Blanchard Companies 2009) as Pat ZIngarmi explained, I can safely say that I have used three of the six in my line of work. I am able to give them (subordinates) the information they need when I come in with change, I can explain to them at a personal level of why the change is good for them, and implementation on how I would disseminate and approach this change with my subordinates.

Dave and Wendy Ulrich, co-authors of The Why of Work have said, “In organizations, meaning and abundance are more about what we do with what we have than about what we have to begin with.” I interpret this quote with being able to create meaning even with little to no resources and being able to push forward with the vision by thinking critically on how to accomplish it.  

In his famous book Man's Search for Meaning, Viktor Frankl posits that it "is a peculiarity of man that he must have something significant yet to do in his life, for that is what gives meaning to life" (2004, p. 56). I interpret this quote as having passion towards an objective or goal, having a purpose to do what one desires especially in a leadership role and all that does is become contagious to his subordinates.

Kouzes and Posner write in The Leadership Challenge: "The executive must find a way to communicate the vision in a way that attracts and excites members of the organization" (1987, p. 106). With this quote I interpret this must find a way to enthusiastically provide vision for an organization when going through change. “For any team to work in the same direction, the team must know the direction that the company is moving into and feel a connection to this common vision or theme” (Nieuwoudt, M., & Rudman, R. 2015).



References:
The Ken Blanchard Companies. (2009, May 20). Pat Zigarmi - Leading change. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTZEnSvZPqc&feature (Links to an external site.)
Nieuwoudt, M., & Rudman, R. (2015). LEADING CHANGE WHILE CREATING VALUE. Accountancy SA, , 40-41. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/docview/1660935915?accountid=27203